From Manual to Digital: Investigating Reporting Barriers and Exploring Pathways to a Smart Digital Platform for Urban Infrastructure and Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65141/ject.v2i2.n7Keywords:
urban infrastructure enhancement, smart platform for urban infrastructure, reporting barriers, issue reporting, digital transformationAbstract
This study investigated the current reporting mechanisms for urban infrastructure and services in a municipality in the Philippines, while identifying barriers that hinder effective citizen engagement and exploring pathways toward digital transformation. With global urbanization projected to reach 70% by 2050, municipalities are under increasing pressure to develop efficient and sustainable infrastructure management systems. Using a descriptive research design and quantitative methods, the study surveyed 148 respondents across four selected barangays to assess existing reporting practices, their effectiveness, challenges encountered, levels of access and awareness, and community readiness for digital transition. Findings revealed a fragmented manual reporting system lacking centralized tracking mechanisms, which limits local government capacity to make data-driven decisions and promptly address infrastructure issues. The research defines the key barriers, including technological limitations, governance challenges, and gaps in digital literacy that impede the adoption of smart solutions. By understanding these gaps, such as limited accessibility, lack of transparency, and inefficient feedback mechanisms, the study provides a foundation for designing a user-centric digital platform tailored to the citizens’ needs. This research contributes to ongoing smart city development efforts in the Philippines, where 70% of urban LGUs are preparing for smart city initiatives yet face significant implementation challenges, offering insights for other municipalities embarking on similar digital transformation journeys.
References
Albano, H. (2024). Empowering local government units with open-source tools: Building a dynamic web-based information system. Isabela State University Linker Journal of Engineering, Computing and Technology, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.65141/ject.v1i1.n1
Amado, M., & Poggi, F. (2022). Urban infrastructures analysis. In Urban sustainability and resilience (pp. 123–140). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824277-3.00007-4
Antos, S. E., & Zhou, Y. (2024, February 08). Smart city solutions: Shaping the Filipino cities of tomorrow. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/eastasiapacific/smart-city-solutions-shaping-filipino-cities-tomorrow
Bacalso, E. A., Martin, J. O., & Jain, A. M. (2025). eAssist DILG: Development of a framework for web-based technical assistance request system with AI-driven analytics. Isabela State University Linker Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Allied Health, 2(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.65141/jessah.v2i1.n4
Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
Brodowicz, M. (2024, July 6). The importance and impact of infrastructure development in urban areas. Aithor. https://aithor.com/essay-examples/the-importance-and-impact-of-infrastructure-development-in-urban-areas
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing “age-friendly” cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457
Cabaobao, A. A., Jr., Malubag, S. L., Briones, J., & Abante, M. V. (2024). Evaluating workflow automation efficiency in a government agency in the Philippines. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Studies, 4(2), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeass.v4i2.2749
Chen, Y., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Ren, Y. (2019). Sustainability based perspective on the utilization efficiency of urban infrastructure: A China study. Habitat International, 93, Article 102050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102050
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Domingo, J., Cabello, K. A., Rufino, G. A., Hilario, L., Villanueva-Jerez, M. J., & Sarmiento, C. J. (2021). A framework in developing a citizen-centered smart city mobile application as a platform for digital participation in Iloilo City. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-4/W6-2021, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlvi-4-w6-2021-153-2021
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. SAGE Publications.
Hernández, C. A. (2021). The role of citizens in smart cities and urban infrastructures. In Smart cities and urban infrastructures (pp. 213–234). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816816-5.00010-3
Hochstenbach, C. (2018). The age dimensions of urban socio-spatial change. Population, Space and Place, 25(2), e2220. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2220
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
Misuraca, G., Codagnone, C., & Rossel, P. (2013). From practice to theory and back to practice: Reflexivity in measurement and evaluation for evidence-based policymaking in the information society. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Suppl. 1), S68–S82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.011
OECD. (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-en
Ogunkan, D. V., & Ogunkan, S. K. (2025). Exploring big data applications in sustainable urban infrastructure: A review. Urban Governance, 5(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.02.003
Okonta, D. E., & Vukovic, V. (2024). Smart cities software applications for sustainability and resilience. Heliyon, 10(12), e32654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32654
Pereira, G. V., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 526–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
Ramos, T., Lorenzo, P. J. M., Ancheta, J., & Ballesteros, M. M. (2022). How far have Philippine LGUs come in developing into smart cities? Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/pn2022.07
Santos, C., Malang, B., Ganagan, J., Ofod, J., Bullanday, U., & Quizon, N. (2025). Assessing the landscape of asset management: Challenges and capacity needs of the local government units (LGUs) in Metro Manila (SSRN Working Paper). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5275222
Thomas, J. C. (2013). Citizen, customer, partner: Rethinking the place of the public in public management. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 786–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12109
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019). World urbanization prospects 2018: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/421). United Nations. https://population.un.org/wup/assets/Publications/WUP2018-Highlights.pdf
Veloso, Á., Fonseca, F., & Ramos, R. (2024). Insights from smart city initiatives for urban sustainability and contemporary urbanism. Smart Cities, 7(6), 3188–3209. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7060124
Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929
Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui021
